PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOY vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOY vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOY achieves a -20.00% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.37% return.


HOOY

1D
-4.94%
1M
7.42%
YTD
-20.00%
6M
-29.79%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOY vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOY and IBIC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOY vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOY
HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOY vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOOYIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

2.24

-1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

17.27

-17.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.32

67.45

-67.13

HOOY vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOY and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOYIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

5.05

-4.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

3.49

-2.94

Drawdowns

HOOY vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOY drawdown since its inception was -51.54%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOY and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOYIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.54%

-0.90%

-50.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.54%

-0.26%

-51.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.38%

-0.13%

-40.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.18%

-0.10%

-20.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.24%

0.07%

+28.17%

Volatility

HOOY vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) has a higher volatility of 15.59% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that HOOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOYIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.59%

0.33%

+15.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.92%

0.67%

+41.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.33%

0.90%

+54.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.48%

1.58%

+52.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.48%

1.58%

+52.90%

HOOY vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOY vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

HOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 160.00%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HOOY
YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF
160.00%82.87%0.00%0.00%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOY and IBIC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOY has higher volatility (15.59%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOY dropped -51.54% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, HOOY leads with 9.03% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOY has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOY.

HOOY has the higher dividend yield at 160.00%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

HOOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOY and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOY and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer