PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOY vs. GDXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOY vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOY achieves a -13.32% return, which is significantly higher than GDXY's -17.89% return.


HOOY

1D
-3.61%
1M
16.98%
YTD
-13.32%
6M
-18.06%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDXY

1D
1.38%
1M
-14.46%
YTD
-17.89%
6M
-21.39%
1Y
16.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOY vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOY and GDXY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOY vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOY
HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOY vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOYGDXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.11

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.46

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

1.23

-1.10

HOOY vs. GDXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the GDXY Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOY and GDXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOY vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOY drawdown since its inception was -51.54%, which is greater than GDXY's maximum drawdown of -34.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOY and GDXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOYGDXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.54%

-34.98%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.54%

-34.98%

-16.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.41%

-34.09%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-7.07%

-13.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.47%

13.17%

+16.30%

Volatility

HOOY vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) has a higher volatility of 19.21% compared to YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) at 14.42%. This indicates that HOOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOYGDXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.21%

14.42%

+4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.24%

33.38%

+8.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.30%

38.80%

+17.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.54%

32.64%

+21.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.54%

32.64%

+21.90%

HOOY vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXY's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOY vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison

HOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 166.23%, more than GDXY's 82.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
82.18%52.13%23.91%
HOOY
YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF
166.23%82.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOY and GDXY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOY has higher volatility (19.21%) compared to GDXY (14.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOY dropped -51.54% vs GDXY's -34.98%.

On 1-year performance, GDXY leads with 16.13% vs 3.80% for HOOY. On fees, HOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GDXY has been the lower-risk option at 14.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDXY has performed better with a 16.13% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.

HOOY has the higher dividend yield at 166.23%, compared with 82.18% for GDXY.

HOOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXY is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOY and 1.08% for GDXY.

GDXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOY and GDXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer