HOOX vs. IWMY
HOOX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while IWMY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOX returned -46.84% vs 19.08% for IWMY. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for IWMY.
Performance
HOOX vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -40.46% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 14.82% return.
HOOX
- 1D
- -16.36%
- 1M
- 14.11%
- 6M
- -36.36%
- YTD
- -40.46%
- 1Y
- -46.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 14.82%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOX vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | -40.46% | 342.84% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF | 14.82% | 11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOX and IWMY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between HOOX and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOX vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank
HOOX
IWMY
HOOX vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.21 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 1.66 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 5.40 | -6.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOX vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and IWMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.11% | -18.72% | -68.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.11% | -11.57% | -75.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.43% | -1.37% | -71.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.48% | -2.90% | -37.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.96% | 3.54% | +55.42% |
Volatility
HOOX vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 40.64% compared to Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) at 3.42%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.64% | 3.42% | +37.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 106.30% | 13.48% | +92.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.53% | 16.18% | +123.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.71% | 15.82% | +127.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.71% | 15.82% | +127.89% |
HOOX vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMY's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOX vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison
HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.72%, less than IWMY's 43.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | 23.72% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF | 43.40% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOX and IWMY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOX has higher volatility (40.64%) compared to IWMY (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs IWMY's -18.72%.
On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 19.08% vs -46.84% for HOOX. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 19.08% return vs -46.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWMY is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 43.40%, compared with 23.72% for HOOX.
HOOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 1.05% for IWMY.
IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOX and IWMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer