PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOX vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOX vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -60.76% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 12.25% return.


HOOX

1D
-12.45%
1M
10.42%
YTD
-60.76%
6M
-72.98%
1Y
-31.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWMY

1D
-1.36%
1M
3.06%
YTD
12.25%
6M
10.99%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOX vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and IWMY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

0.57

The correlation between HOOX and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOX vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOX
HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOX vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOOXIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.26

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

2.03

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

6.66

-7.25

HOOX vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOX and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOXIWMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

1.49

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.95

-0.61

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOXIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.11%

-18.72%

-68.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.11%

-11.57%

-75.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.84%

-1.36%

-80.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.46%

-2.98%

-34.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.44%

3.51%

+49.93%

Volatility

HOOX vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 41.73% compared to Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) at 5.42%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOXIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.73%

5.42%

+36.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.05%

12.62%

+88.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.62%

15.69%

+121.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.08%

15.75%

+128.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.08%

15.75%

+128.33%

HOOX vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOX vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.99%, less than IWMY's 45.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HOOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF
35.99%14.12%0.00%0.00%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
45.96%63.33%107.92%11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOX and IWMY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOX has higher volatility (41.73%) compared to IWMY (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 23.33% vs -31.77% for HOOX. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 23.33% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 45.96%, compared with 35.99% for HOOX.

HOOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.99% for IWMY.

IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOX and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer