HOOW vs. YMAG
HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while YMAG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.
Performance
HOOW vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -24.22% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's -1.13% return.
HOOW
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 24.39%
- YTD
- -24.22%
- 6M
- -29.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOW vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -24.22% | 52.60% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | -1.13% | 21.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOW and YMAG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.54 |
HOOW vs. YMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOOW
YMAG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
HOOW
YMAG
Basic Materials
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Communication Services
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Consumer Cyclical
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Consumer Defensive
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Energy
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Healthcare
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Industrials
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Real Estate
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Technology
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Utilities
HOOW
-
YMAG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOW vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank
HOOW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YMAG
HOOW vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOW | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOW vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and YMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOW | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.74% | -25.96% | -39.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.54% | -7.32% | -41.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.67% | -4.54% | -25.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility
HOOW vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOW | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.09% | 16.41% | +67.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.09% | 20.94% | +63.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.09% | 20.94% | +63.15% |
HOOW vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOW vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison
HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 147.58%, more than YMAG's 52.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 147.58% | 67.92% | 0.00% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 52.85% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOW and YMAG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 147.58%, compared with 52.85% for YMAG.
HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YMAG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 1.28% for YMAG.
Find the right allocation for HOOW and YMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer