HOOW vs. IFED

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HOOW is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOW returned 28.92% vs 2.52% for IFED. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.

Performance

HOOW vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.07% return.

HOOW

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: 47.20%
• YTD: -14.70%
• 6M: -20.92%
• 1Y: 28.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IFED

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: -3.07%
• 6M: -3.90%
• 1Y: 2.52%
• 3Y*: 16.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-14.70%	52.60%
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN	-3.07%	6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and IFED is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

HOOW vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 16
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 19
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 12

IFED

IFED Risk / Return Rank: 10
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 10
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOW	IFED	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	0.15	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	0.34	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.04	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	0.17	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.76	0.43	+0.33

HOOW vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOW and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and IFED.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOW	IFED	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.74%	-22.36%	-43.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.74%	-14.65%	-51.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.07%	-5.05%	-37.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.96%	-5.83%	-24.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.05%	5.88%	+32.17%

Volatility

HOOW vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a higher volatility of 28.68% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 6.74%. This indicates that HOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOW	IFED	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.68%	6.74%	+21.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.22%	13.81%	+48.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.38%	16.84%	+67.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.14%	19.92%	+64.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.14%	19.92%	+64.22%

HOOW vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOW vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 136.33%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	136.33%	67.92%
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOW and IFED in my portfolio?

HOOW and IFED have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOW or IFED?

HOOW has higher volatility (28.68%) compared to IFED (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs IFED's -22.36%.

Which ETF is better, HOOW or IFED?

On 1-year performance, HOOW leads with 28.92% vs 2.52% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOW or IFED?

Over the 1-year period, HOOW has performed better with a 28.92% return vs 2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOW or IFED?

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOW or IFED?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 136.33%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

What is the main difference between HOOW and IFED?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 0.45% for IFED.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.