PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOW vs. ICOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOW vs. ICOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -34.08% return, which is significantly lower than ICOI's -22.33% return.


HOOW

1D
-7.51%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-34.08%
6M
-46.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICOI

1D
-5.88%
1M
-10.04%
YTD
-22.33%
6M
-32.60%
1Y
-42.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. ICOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
-34.08%46.56%
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-22.33%-28.11%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and ICOI is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOW vs. ICOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOW

ICOI
ICOI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ICOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOI Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. ICOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOOW vs. ICOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOWICOIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

-0.50

+0.46

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. ICOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than ICOI's maximum drawdown of -58.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and ICOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOWICOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.74%

-58.10%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.23%

-55.30%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-27.43%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.48%

Volatility

HOOW vs. ICOI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOWICOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.86%

49.40%

+34.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.86%

50.41%

+33.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.86%

50.41%

+33.45%

HOOW vs. ICOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOI's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOW vs. ICOI - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 163.90%, less than ICOI's 338.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
163.90%67.92%
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
338.05%247.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOW and ICOI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICOI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICOI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 338.05%, compared with 163.90% for HOOW.

HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ICOI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 0.98% for ICOI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOW and ICOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer