HOOW vs. DLLL
HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HOOW is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOW returned 28.92% vs 765.95% for DLLL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
HOOW vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 762.51% return.
HOOW
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- 47.20%
- YTD
- -14.70%
- 6M
- -20.92%
- 1Y
- 28.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- 89.37%
- YTD
- 762.51%
- 6M
- 738.64%
- 1Y
- 765.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOW vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -14.70% | 52.60% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 762.51% | 4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOW and DLLL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.35 |
HOOW vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOOW
DLLL
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
HOOW
DLLL
-
Basic Materials
HOOW
-
DLLL
-
Communication Services
HOOW
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
HOOW
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Defensive
HOOW
-
DLLL
-
Energy
HOOW
-
DLLL
-
Healthcare
HOOW
-
DLLL
-
Industrials
HOOW
-
DLLL
-
Real Estate
HOOW
-
DLLL
-
Technology
HOOW
-
DLLL
Utilities
HOOW
-
DLLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOW vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
HOOW
DLLL
HOOW vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOW | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.56 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 13.52 | -13.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | 27.52 | -26.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOW vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, roughly equal to the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOW | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.74% | -68.58% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.74% | -57.19% | -8.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.07% | -18.41% | -23.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.96% | -25.86% | -4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.05% | 28.05% | +10.00% |
Volatility
HOOW vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) is 28.68%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 66.89%. This indicates that HOOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOW | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.68% | 66.89% | -38.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.22% | 102.56% | -40.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.38% | 131.00% | -46.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.14% | 129.67% | -45.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.14% | 129.67% | -45.53% |
HOOW vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOW vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 136.33%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 136.33% | 67.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOW and DLLL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (66.89%) compared to HOOW (28.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 765.95% vs 28.92% for HOOW. On fees, HOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, HOOW has been the lower-risk option at 28.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 765.95% return vs 28.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 136.33%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.91 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOW and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer