HOOW vs. CHAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT).
HOOW and CHAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HOOW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 18, 2025. CHAT is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on May 17, 2023.
Performance
HOOW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HOOW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -44.41% | 46.56% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 9.04% | 31.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -44.41% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 9.04% return.
HOOW
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -13.07%
- YTD
- -44.41%
- 6M
- -58.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 87.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HOOW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HOOW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
HOOW
CHAT
HOOW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOOW | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 1.33 | -1.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOW and CHAT is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HOOW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 163.81%, more than CHAT's 2.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 163.81% | 67.92% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 2.61% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
HOOW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and CHAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOW | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.74% | -31.34% | -34.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.25% | -3.05% | -59.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.06% | -5.61% | -17.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.86% | — |
Volatility
HOOW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HOOW | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.31% | 34.44% | +47.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.31% | 29.33% | +52.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.31% | 29.33% | +52.98% |