HOOW vs. BITI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. HOOW is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOW returned -20.32% vs 56.28% for BITI. Their -0.58 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

HOOW vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -28.14% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 25.22% return.

HOOW

• 1D: 5.18%
• 1M: -24.05%
• 6M: -4.87%
• YTD: -28.14%
• 1Y: -20.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.54%

BITI

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -4.03%
• 6M: 13.09%
• YTD: 25.22%
• 1Y: 56.28%
• 3Y*: -32.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -35.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	$24.18M	$25.87M	$38.72M
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	$4.59M	$5.25M	$5.35M

HOOW vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-28.14%	52.60%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	25.22%	16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and BITI is -0.60, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	-0.58

The correlation between HOOW and BITI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HOOW vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 9
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 12
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 51
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOOW vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOW	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	1.28	-1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	1.86	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.22	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	2.24	-2.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.50	5.45	-5.95

HOOW vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOW Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOW and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOW	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.74%	-92.16%	+26.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.74%	-25.28%	-40.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.20%	-86.33%	+35.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.22%	-68.61%	+37.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.64%	10.37%	+30.27%

Volatility

HOOW vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a higher volatility of 21.30% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 8.93%. This indicates that HOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOW	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.30%	8.93%	+12.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.66%	33.35%	+32.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	85.14%	44.25%	+40.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.73%	52.01%	+31.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.73%	52.01%	+31.72%

HOOW vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOW vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 162.58%, more than BITI's 21.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	21.80%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	162.58%	67.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOW and BITI in my portfolio?

HOOW and BITI have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOW or BITI?

HOOW has higher volatility (21.30%) compared to BITI (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, HOOW or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 56.28% vs -20.32% for HOOW. On fees, HOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOW or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 56.28% return vs -20.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOW or BITI?

HOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOW or BITI?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 162.58%, compared with 21.80% for BITI.

What is the main difference between HOOW and BITI?

HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.