HOOD vs. ZM
HOOD (Robinhood Markets, Inc.) and ZM (Zoom Video Communications, Inc.) are both stocks. HOOD operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while ZM operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, HOOD returned 108.34%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for ZM. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HOOD vs. ZM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOD achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly lower than ZM's 17.77% return.
HOOD
- 1D
- -6.63%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- -27.08%
- 6M
- -37.50%
- 1Y
- 13.74%
- 3Y*
- 108.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZM
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- 17.77%
- 6M
- 15.94%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- -21.27%
- 10Y*
- —
HOOD vs. ZM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | -27.08% | 203.54% | 192.46% | 56.51% | -54.17% | -48.99% |
ZM Zoom Video Communications, Inc. | 17.77% | 5.73% | 13.49% | 6.16% | -63.17% | -52.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOD and ZM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HOOD and ZM has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
HOOD:
$75.46B
ZM:
$30.51B
HOOD:
$2.07
ZM:
$6.79
HOOD:
39.86
ZM:
14.97
HOOD:
0.00
ZM:
0.11
HOOD:
19.32
ZM:
6.28
HOOD:
7.79
ZM:
3.06
HOOD:
$3.91B
ZM:
$4.93B
HOOD:
$2.86B
ZM:
$3.82B
HOOD:
$1.80B
ZM:
$1.90B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOD vs. ZM — Risk / Return Rank
HOOD
ZM
HOOD vs. ZM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOOD | ZM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.15 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 1.03 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 2.84 | -2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOOD | ZM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 0.61 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.13 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
HOOD vs. ZM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOD drawdown since its inception was -90.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ZM drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOD and ZM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOD | ZM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.21% | -90.27% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.26% | -24.42% | -32.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.26% | -25.45% | -31.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -86.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.91% | -82.12% | +36.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.96% | -62.82% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.12% | 8.99% | +22.13% |
Volatility
HOOD vs. ZM - Volatility Comparison
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) has a higher volatility of 23.12% compared to Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) at 17.82%. This indicates that HOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOD | ZM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.12% | 17.82% | +5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.46% | 34.16% | +16.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.04% | 41.30% | +27.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.06% | 44.43% | +29.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.06% | 54.52% | +19.54% |
Dividends
HOOD vs. ZM - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOOD nor ZM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HOOD vs. ZM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Robinhood Markets, Inc. and Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HOOD vs. ZM - Profitability Comparison
HOOD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ZM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a gross profit of 964.72M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.9%.
HOOD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ZM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported an operating income of 310.47M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
HOOD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 346.00M and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in a net margin of 96.4%.
ZM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a net income of 425.68M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 34.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOD and ZM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOD has higher volatility (23.12%) compared to ZM (17.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOD dropped -90.21% vs ZM's -90.27%.
ZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOD and ZM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer