HOMZ vs. XLB
HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) and XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOMZ is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while XLB is a Materials fund tracking the Materials Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HOMZ returned 4.71%/yr vs 6.28%/yr for XLB. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HOMZ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLB.
Performance
HOMZ vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOMZ achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 13.40% return.
HOMZ
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.20%
XLB
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.42K | $133.49K | $168.14K | |
| $599.91M | $576.83M | $594.61M |
HOMZ vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 3.43% | 2.72% | 9.49% | 36.49% | -28.14% | 41.02% | 15.80% | 17.38% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 13.40% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 12.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOMZ and XLB is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between HOMZ and XLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
HOMZ vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOMZ
XLB
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HOMZ
XLB
-
Consumer Cyclical
HOMZ
XLB
Industrials
HOMZ
XLB
Financial Services
HOMZ
XLB
-
Basic Materials
HOMZ
XLB
Consumer Defensive
HOMZ
XLB
-
Technology
HOMZ
XLB
-
Communication Services
HOMZ
XLB
-
Energy
HOMZ
-
XLB
-
Healthcare
HOMZ
-
XLB
-
Utilities
HOMZ
-
XLB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOMZ vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
HOMZ
XLB
HOMZ vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOMZ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.20 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.60 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 4.77 | -3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOMZ vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOMZ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMZ and XLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOMZ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -59.83% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.71% | -12.38% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -23.17% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.76% | -24.72% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | -4.09% | -2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -10.80% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 4.16% | +3.67% |
Volatility
HOMZ vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 5.65%. This indicates that HOMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOMZ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 5.65% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 14.07% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 17.69% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 19.10% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 20.68% | +4.24% |
HOMZ vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOMZ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOMZ vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
HOMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than XLB's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 2.61% | 2.54% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.03% | 1.21% | 3.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.66% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOMZ and XLB have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOMZ has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to XLB (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMZ dropped -48.10% vs XLB's -59.83%.
On 5-year performance, XLB leads with 6.28% vs 4.71% for HOMZ. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLB has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLB has performed better with a 6.28% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HOMZ.
HOMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.66% for XLB.
HOMZ is categorized as Building & Construction, while XLB is Materials. HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Hoya Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HOMZ and 0.13% for XLB.
XLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOMZ and XLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer