HOMZ vs. RSPM
HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) and RSPM (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - HOMZ tracks the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index while RSPM tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HOMZ returned 3.51%/yr vs 4.29%/yr for RSPM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOMZ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPM.
Performance
HOMZ vs. RSPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOMZ achieves a -3.23% return, which is significantly lower than RSPM's 15.78% return.
HOMZ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -3.23%
- 6M
- -6.20%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 6M
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
HOMZ vs. RSPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | -3.23% | 2.72% | 9.49% | 36.49% | -28.14% | 41.02% | 15.80% | 17.71% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 15.78% | 6.90% | -1.30% | 8.32% | -9.95% | 31.21% | 22.77% | 12.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOMZ and RSPM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between HOMZ and RSPM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
HOMZ vs. RSPM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOMZ
RSPM
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HOMZ
RSPM
-
Consumer Cyclical
HOMZ
RSPM
Financial Services
HOMZ
RSPM
Industrials
HOMZ
RSPM
Basic Materials
HOMZ
RSPM
Technology
HOMZ
RSPM
-
Consumer Defensive
HOMZ
RSPM
-
Communication Services
HOMZ
RSPM
-
Energy
HOMZ
-
RSPM
-
Healthcare
HOMZ
-
RSPM
-
Utilities
HOMZ
-
RSPM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOMZ vs. RSPM — Risk / Return Rank
HOMZ
RSPM
HOMZ vs. RSPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOMZ | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.23 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 1.96 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | 5.36 | -4.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOMZ | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 1.33 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.21 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.39 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
HOMZ vs. RSPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOMZ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum RSPM drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMZ and RSPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOMZ | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -61.18% | +13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.71% | -12.32% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -27.19% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.76% | -27.19% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -4.13% | -8.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -8.79% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.35% | 4.49% | +2.86% |
Volatility
HOMZ vs. RSPM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) is 5.34%, while Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that HOMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOMZ | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 5.82% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | 13.40% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 18.15% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 20.12% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 21.93% | +3.06% |
HOMZ vs. RSPM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOMZ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOMZ vs. RSPM - Dividend Comparison
HOMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than RSPM's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 2.74% | 2.54% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.03% | 1.21% | 3.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.50% | 2.06% | 2.04% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.28% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOMZ and RSPM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPM has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to HOMZ (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMZ dropped -48.10% vs RSPM's -61.18%.
On 5-year performance, RSPM leads with 4.29% vs 3.51% for HOMZ. On fees, HOMZ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HOMZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RSPM has performed better with a 4.29% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOMZ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPM.
HOMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.50% for RSPM.
HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while RSPM tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Pettee Investors and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HOMZ and 0.40% for RSPM.
RSPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOMZ and RSPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer