HOLA vs. XCLR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and XCLR (Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. HOLA is actively managed, while XCLR is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XCLR.

Performance

HOLA vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than XCLR's 2.42% return.

HOLA

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.14%
• YTD: 4.14%
• 6M: 6.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XCLR

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 14.14%
• 3Y*: 13.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	4.14%	7.55%
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	2.42%	7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and XCLR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.64

HOLA vs. XCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HOLA	XCLR
Financial Services	23.9%	11.8%
Industrials	15.5%	8.3%
Technology	11.9%	35.6%
Healthcare	9.5%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	10.1%
Basic Materials	5.2%	1.8%
Communication Services	3.1%	11.2%
Utilities	2.7%	2.4%
Energy	2.6%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.0%	2.0%

Return for Risk

HOLA vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCLR

XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 43
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOLA	XCLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	0.73	+0.70

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum XCLR drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and XCLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOLA	XCLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-14.63%	+7.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.29%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	0.00%	-1.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-4.71%	+3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HOLA	XCLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.52%	8.58%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.52%	10.44%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.52%	10.44%	-0.92%

HOLA vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOLA vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than XCLR's 12.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.90%	3.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	12.84%	13.15%	18.76%	1.40%	1.01%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOLA and XCLR in my portfolio?

HOLA and XCLR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HOLA or XCLR?

On fees, XCLR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOLA or XCLR?

XCLR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HOLA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOLA or XCLR?

XCLR has the higher dividend yield at 12.84%, compared with 2.90% for HOLA.

What is the main difference between HOLA and XCLR?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.25% for XCLR.