HOLA vs. VAMO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while VAMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOLA returned 17.66% vs 21.53% for VAMO. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.

Performance

HOLA vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HOLA having a 7.29% return and VAMO slightly higher at 7.53%.

HOLA

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 3.35%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.71%

VAMO

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.63%
• 6M: 4.61%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 1Y: 21.53%
• 3Y*: 12.37%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 5.92%
• ALL TIME*: 4.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	$762.47K	$628.26K	$1.14M
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	$140.83K	$92.60K	$940.22K

HOLA vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	7.29%	7.60%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	7.53%	12.30%

Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and VAMO is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

HOLA vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HOLA

HOLA Risk / Return Rank: 73
HOLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
HOLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HOLA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
HOLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
HOLA Martin Ratio Rank: 69

VAMO

VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 82
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOLA vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOLA	VAMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.86	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.74	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	3.68	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.40	10.59	-2.19

HOLA vs. VAMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOLA Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the VAMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOLA and VAMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and VAMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOLA	VAMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-41.84%	+34.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-5.55%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.59%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-9.84%	+8.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	1.93%	+0.13%

Volatility

HOLA vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.12%. This indicates that HOLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOLA	VAMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	2.12%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.38%	7.29%	+1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.13%	11.00%	-0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.15%	16.74%	-6.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	18.10%	-7.95%

HOLA vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOLA vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than VAMO's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.82%	3.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	0.61%	1.41%	0.84%	1.35%	1.10%	1.07%	1.03%	1.15%	1.03%	0.35%	0.56%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOLA and VAMO in my portfolio?

HOLA and VAMO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOLA or VAMO?

HOLA has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to VAMO (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOLA dropped -6.99% vs VAMO's -41.84%.

Which ETF is better, HOLA or VAMO?

On 1-year performance, VAMO leads with 21.53% vs 17.66% for HOLA. On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOLA or VAMO?

Over the 1-year period, VAMO has performed better with a 21.53% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOLA or VAMO?

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOLA or VAMO?

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.61% for VAMO.

What is the main difference between HOLA and VAMO?

HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while VAMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.65% for VAMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.