HNASX vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HNASX (Homestead Growth Fund) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both funds - HNASX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Homestead, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Over the past 10 years, HNASX returned 17.24%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for VTV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HNASX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

HNASX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNASX achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, HNASX has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 17.24%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.48% annualized return.

HNASX

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 5.14%
• 6M: 4.93%
• 1Y: 19.49%
• 3Y*: 23.30%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: 17.24%

VTV

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 4.23%
• YTD: 12.30%
• 6M: 13.12%
• 1Y: 26.25%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 11.24%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNASX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund	5.14%	16.97%	30.93%	47.78%	-33.56%	16.94%	38.72%	28.39%	2.84%	36.54%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	12.30%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	26.53%	2.33%	25.66%	-5.47%	17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HNASX and VTV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between HNASX and VTV has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HNASX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNASX

HNASX Risk / Return Rank: 15
HNASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HNASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HNASX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HNASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
HNASX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 79
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNASX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HNASX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.61	-1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	3.74	-2.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.47	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	4.15	-3.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.33	15.69	-12.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HNASX vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNASX and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HNASX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	2.61	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.81	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.75	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.51	-0.20

Drawdowns

HNASX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNASX drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNASX and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	HNASX	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.74%	-59.27%	-13.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.90%	-6.35%	-12.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.23%	-14.52%	-6.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.22%	-17.04%	-20.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.22%	-36.78%	-0.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	0.00%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.68%	-7.87%	-16.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.03%	1.68%	+4.35%

Volatility

HNASX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that HNASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HNASX	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	2.52%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.81%	7.55%	+5.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.37%	10.11%	+6.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.30%	13.88%	+8.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	16.67%	+5.13%

HNASX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNASX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

HNASX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

HNASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.56%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund	14.56%	15.31%	6.29%	2.57%	6.80%	9.12%	4.73%	5.35%	10.41%	6.41%	1.54%	6.52%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.86%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HNASX and VTV in my portfolio?

HNASX and VTV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HNASX or VTV?

HNASX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNASX dropped -72.74% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.