PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNASX vs. ANFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HNASX vs. ANFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNASX achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly lower than ANFFX's 22.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HNASX has outperformed ANFFX with an annualized return of 17.36%, while ANFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.32% annualized return.


HNASX

1D
1.02%
1M
6.15%
YTD
6.21%
6M
5.70%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
17.36%

ANFFX

1D
0.67%
1M
11.90%
YTD
22.83%
6M
25.77%
1Y
55.61%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
16.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNASX vs. ANFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HNASX
Homestead Growth Fund
6.21%16.97%30.93%47.78%-33.56%16.94%38.72%28.39%2.84%36.54%
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
22.83%30.96%23.52%29.10%-29.69%11.98%33.43%26.38%-4.41%34.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HNASX and ANFFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2001

0.90

The correlation between HNASX and ANFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HNASX vs. ANFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNASX
HNASX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HNASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNASX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HNASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNASX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ANFFX
ANFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ANFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ANFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNASX vs. ANFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HNASXANFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

3.32

-1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

4.14

-2.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.56

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

4.24

-3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.66

19.03

-15.38

HNASX vs. ANFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the ANFFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNASX and ANFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HNASXANFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

3.32

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.73

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.86

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.53

-0.22

Drawdowns

HNASX vs. ANFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNASX drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than ANFFX's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNASX and ANFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNASXANFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.74%

-55.37%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.90%

-13.36%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.23%

-20.81%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.22%

-37.10%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.22%

-37.10%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.68%

-11.37%

-13.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

2.98%

+3.05%

Volatility

HNASX vs. ANFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) is 3.17%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that HNASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNASXANFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

5.27%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

13.72%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

17.22%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.29%

19.39%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

19.11%

+2.69%

HNASX vs. ANFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNASX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than ANFFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

HNASX vs. ANFFX - Dividend Comparison

HNASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.41%, more than ANFFX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
8.06%9.90%9.56%3.89%0.00%7.53%2.45%7.26%9.84%8.19%2.13%6.07%
HNASX
Homestead Growth Fund
14.41%15.31%6.29%2.57%6.80%9.12%4.73%5.35%10.41%6.41%1.54%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


HNASX and ANFFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANFFX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to HNASX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNASX dropped -72.74% vs ANFFX's -55.37%.

ANFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNASX and ANFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer