PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNACX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HNACX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class (HNACX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNACX achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 8.60% return.


HNACX

1D
-0.68%
1M
7.51%
YTD
9.63%
6M
8.26%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
28.99%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*

FSPGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.60%
6M
7.98%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNACX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HNACX
Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class
9.63%14.04%46.43%53.86%-37.67%15.43%54.82%33.53%-1.24%35.33%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
8.60%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HNACX and FSPGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.96

The correlation between HNACX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HNACX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNACX
HNACX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HNACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
HNACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNACX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class (HNACX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HNACXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.76

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

5.90

-2.01

HNACX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNACX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HNACXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.85

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.75

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.90

-0.09

Drawdowns

HNACX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNACX drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNACX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNACXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-32.66%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.94%

-16.17%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.32%

-23.32%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.46%

-32.66%

-10.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.38%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-6.37%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

4.81%

+0.86%

Volatility

HNACX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class (HNACX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 3.32%. This indicates that HNACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNACXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.32%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

11.58%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

15.39%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.80%

21.49%

+4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.88%

21.55%

+3.33%

HNACX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNACX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

HNACX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

HNACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.21%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%
HNACX
Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class
10.21%11.19%21.66%0.00%0.00%18.62%12.25%8.97%11.07%11.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, HNACX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HNACX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to FSPGX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNACX dropped -43.46% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNACX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer