HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L
HMXD.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) and PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from HSBC and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMXD.L returned 4.91%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for PAXG.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMXD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PAXG.L.
Performance
HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMXD.L is traded in USD, while PAXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HMXD.L having a 8.48% return and PAXG.L slightly higher at 8.57%.
HMXD.L
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- 16.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
PAXG.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 12.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXD.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 8.48% | 20.24% | 5.29% | 6.26% | -4.99% | 2.80% | 6.72% | 20.07% | -11.50% | 21.80% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 8.57% | 16.83% | -0.21% | 2.59% | -10.69% | -1.18% | 4.58% | 8.02% | -6.39% | 14.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMXD.L and PAXG.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2016 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, HMXD.L and PAXG.L have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Basic Materials
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Industrials
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Real Estate
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Healthcare
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Energy
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Utilities
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Consumer Defensive
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Communication Services
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Technology
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMXD.L
PAXG.L
HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMXD.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.39 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 3.96 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMXD.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 0.94 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.06 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.32 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMXD.L drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, roughly equal to the maximum PAXG.L drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMXD.L and PAXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMXD.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.10% | -37.04% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -9.02% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.93% | -23.28% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.73% | -29.56% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.35% | -3.57% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -11.15% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.18% | -0.42% |
Volatility
HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that HMXD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMXD.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 4.10% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 10.91% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 13.37% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.97% | 21.69% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 26.87% | -4.64% |
HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMXD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMXD.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison
HMXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than PAXG.L's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXD.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 3.05% | 3.30% | 3.86% | 4.09% | 4.06% | 2.81% | 2.85% | 3.74% | 4.15% | 3.09% | 3.62% | 4.31% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMXD.L and PAXG.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HMXD.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HMXD.L and 0.12% for PAXG.L.
Find the right allocation for HMXD.L and PAXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer