HMXD.L vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
HMXD.L and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HMXD.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Sep 3, 2010. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both HMXD.L and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HMXD.L or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between HMXD.L and VOO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HMXD.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HMXD.L:
0.51
VOO:
2.21
HMXD.L:
0.83
VOO:
2.92
HMXD.L:
1.09
VOO:
1.41
HMXD.L:
0.55
VOO:
3.34
HMXD.L:
2.01
VOO:
14.07
HMXD.L:
3.94%
VOO:
2.01%
HMXD.L:
15.31%
VOO:
12.80%
HMXD.L:
-38.10%
VOO:
-33.99%
HMXD.L:
-6.18%
VOO:
-1.36%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMXD.L achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, HMXD.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.21%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.
HMXD.L
2.49%
2.72%
4.82%
15.44%
4.14%
8.21%
VOO
1.98%
1.13%
8.46%
25.58%
14.35%
13.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HMXD.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMXD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HMXD.L vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HMXD.L
VOO
HMXD.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HMXD.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
HMXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than VOO's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXD.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 1.90% | 3.86% | 4.09% | 4.06% | 2.81% | 2.85% | 3.74% | 4.15% | 3.09% | 3.62% | 4.31% | 3.98% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.22% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
HMXD.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMXD.L drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMXD.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HMXD.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.97%. This indicates that HMXD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.