PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMXD.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
6.02%20.24%5.29%6.26%-4.99%2.80%6.72%20.07%-11.50%21.80%
CP9G.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
2.50%13.88%-0.83%4.68%-11.95%5.79%3.56%18.33%-10.87%25.54%
Different Trading Currencies

HMXD.L is traded in USD, while CP9G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CP9G.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMXD.L achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly higher than CP9G.L's 2.50% return. Over the past 10 years, HMXD.L has outperformed CP9G.L with an annualized return of 7.78%, while CP9G.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.


HMXD.L

1D
2.72%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
6.02%
6M
5.82%
1Y
25.12%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
7.78%

CP9G.L

1D
2.59%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
2.50%
6M
1.45%
1Y
14.22%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
5.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMXD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CP9G.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMXD.L
HMXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HMXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HMXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CP9G.L
CP9G.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMXD.LCP9G.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

0.84

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

1.23

+0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.35

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.20

4.63

+3.57

HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMXD.L and CP9G.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMXD.LCP9G.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.84

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.12

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.30

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.30

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between HMXD.L and CP9G.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L - Dividend Comparison

HMXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while CP9G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMXD.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
3.12%3.30%3.86%4.09%4.06%2.81%2.85%3.74%4.15%3.09%3.62%4.31%
CP9G.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMXD.L drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, roughly equal to the maximum CP9G.L drawdown of -38.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMXD.L and CP9G.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HMXD.LCP9G.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.10%

-32.32%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.20%

-8.72%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.73%

-18.14%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.10%

-32.32%

-5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-4.43%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-6.09%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.70%

+0.35%

Volatility

HMXD.L vs. CP9G.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) is 5.73%, while Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that HMXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CP9G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HMXD.LCP9G.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

6.33%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

10.69%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

16.92%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.97%

16.68%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.39%

17.48%

+4.91%