HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HMWD.L (HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF) and HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - HMWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HMEF.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMWD.L returned 13.25%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for HMEF.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HMWD.L is traded in USD, while HMEF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMEF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMWD.L achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than HMEF.L's 25.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HMWD.L has outperformed HMEF.L with an annualized return of 13.25%, while HMEF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.

HMWD.L

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 11.06%
• 1Y: 26.15%
• 3Y*: 20.87%
• 5Y*: 11.93%
• 10Y*: 13.25%

HMEF.L

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 25.21%
• 6M: 28.23%
• 1Y: 49.76%
• 3Y*: 20.79%
• 5Y*: 4.61%
• 10Y*: 7.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HMWD.L HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF	9.88%	21.06%	19.13%	24.63%	-18.24%	22.41%	16.43%	27.43%	-8.89%	23.12%
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	25.21%	31.08%	4.66%	5.11%	-21.94%	-4.97%	16.13%	14.77%	-16.44%	35.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HMWD.L and HMEF.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011	0.68

The correlation between HMWD.L and HMEF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HMWD.L	HMEF.L
Technology	28.3%	42.9%
Financial Services	15.7%	17.8%
Industrials	11.5%	6.8%
Communication Services	9.2%	6.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	8.7%
Healthcare	8.8%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	2.7%
Energy	4.2%	3.5%
Basic Materials	3.3%	5.9%
Utilities	2.7%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.0%

Return for Risk

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMWD.L

HMWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
HMWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
HMWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
HMWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HMWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
HMWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

HMEF.L

HMEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HMEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HMEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
HMEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
HMEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMWD.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.61	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.49	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.47	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	3.79	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.35	13.67	-0.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMWD.L and HMEF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMWD.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	2.61	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.25	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.40	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.19	+0.55

Drawdowns

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMWD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.03%, smaller than the maximum HMEF.L drawdown of -42.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMWD.L and HMEF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMWD.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.03%	-42.58%	+8.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-13.08%	+4.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.57%	-17.13%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.00%	-39.72%	+13.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.03%	-42.58%	+8.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-2.86%	+2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-16.39%	+11.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	3.63%	-1.68%

Volatility

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) is 3.41%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that HMWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMWD.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	8.21%	-4.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	16.33%	-7.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.87%	19.00%	-7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	18.66%	-3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	19.41%	-3.56%

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HMWD.L and HMEF.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HMWD.L vs. HMEF.L - Dividend Comparison

HMWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than HMEF.L's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%
HMWD.L HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF	1.17%	1.24%	1.43%	1.57%	1.79%	1.31%	1.44%	1.91%	2.23%	1.81%	2.00%	1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMWD.L and HMEF.L in my portfolio?

HMWD.L and HMEF.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HMWD.L or HMEF.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMWD.L or HMEF.L?

HMWD.L and HMEF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between HMWD.L and HMEF.L?

HMWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while HMEF.L is Emerging Markets Equities. HMWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HMEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD.