PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HMWD.L vs. EIMI.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


HMWD.LEIMI.L
YTD Return18.79%14.59%
1Y Return31.09%23.86%
3Y Return (Ann)8.12%-0.39%
5Y Return (Ann)13.11%5.61%
10Y Return (Ann)10.70%4.21%
Sharpe Ratio2.781.72
Sortino Ratio3.912.55
Omega Ratio1.511.31
Calmar Ratio2.550.86
Martin Ratio18.1210.23
Ulcer Index1.79%2.53%
Daily Std Dev11.62%15.07%
Max Drawdown-34.03%-38.73%
Current Drawdown-0.56%-9.38%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between HMWD.L and EIMI.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

HMWD.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HMWD.L achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 14.59% return. Over the past 10 years, HMWD.L has outperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of 10.70%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
14.25%
15.47%
HMWD.L
EIMI.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HMWD.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMWD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for EIMI.L: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%
Expense ratio chart for HMWD.L: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HMWD.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMWD.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HMWD.L, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.78
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HMWD.L, currently valued at 3.91, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HMWD.L, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.51
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HMWD.L, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HMWD.L, currently valued at 18.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.12
EIMI.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EIMI.L, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EIMI.L, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EIMI.L, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EIMI.L, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.86
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EIMI.L, currently valued at 10.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.23

HMWD.L vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMWD.L and EIMI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.78
1.72
HMWD.L
EIMI.L

Dividends

HMWD.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

HMWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HMWD.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF
1.42%1.57%1.79%1.31%1.44%1.91%2.23%1.81%2.00%1.93%1.83%1.83%
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HMWD.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMWD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.03%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMWD.L and EIMI.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-0.56%
-9.38%
HMWD.L
EIMI.L

Volatility

HMWD.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) is 2.55%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that HMWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.55%
5.51%
HMWD.L
EIMI.L