HMSFX vs. HFCSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HMSFX (Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class) and HFCSX (Hennessy Focus Fund) are both mutual funds - HMSFX is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian US Midstream Energy Index, while HFCSX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Hennessy. Over the past 5 years, HMSFX returned 19.37%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for HFCSX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMSFX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for HFCSX.

Performance

HMSFX vs. HFCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) and Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMSFX achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly higher than HFCSX's 13.28% return.

HMSFX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: 16.30%
• 6M: 15.01%
• 1Y: 15.66%
• 3Y*: 21.48%
• 5Y*: 19.37%
• 10Y*: —

HFCSX

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: 15.73%
• YTD: 13.28%
• 6M: 17.94%
• 1Y: 48.78%
• 3Y*: 23.79%
• 5Y*: 10.91%
• 10Y*: 12.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMSFX vs. HFCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HMSFX Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class	16.30%	-0.76%	35.85%	23.50%	28.88%	36.22%	-31.21%	11.77%	-20.36%
HFCSX Hennessy Focus Fund	13.28%	28.30%	14.67%	20.99%	-24.92%	32.04%	5.47%	34.96%	-14.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HMSFX and HFCSX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between HMSFX and HFCSX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HMSFX vs. HFCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMSFX

HMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 14
HMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
HMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
HMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
HMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

HFCSX

HFCSX Risk / Return Rank: 35
HFCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
HFCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
HFCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
HFCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
HFCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMSFX vs. HFCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) and Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMSFX	HFCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.78	-0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	2.44	-1.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.29	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	2.59	-0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.20	5.92	-1.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMSFX vs. HFCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMSFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the HFCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMSFX and HFCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMSFX	HFCSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	1.78	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	0.48	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.46	-0.11

Drawdowns

HMSFX vs. HFCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMSFX drawdown since its inception was -68.50%, which is greater than HFCSX's maximum drawdown of -59.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMSFX and HFCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMSFX	HFCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.50%	-59.41%	-9.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.98%	-19.90%	+12.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.38%	-23.02%	+6.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.17%	-33.13%	+11.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.02%	-2.57%	-2.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.41%	-9.86%	-2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	8.69%	-4.80%

Volatility

HMSFX vs. HFCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) is 6.12%, while Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that HMSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMSFX	HFCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.12%	10.19%	-4.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	20.75%	-9.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.17%	28.96%	-13.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	22.85%	-2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.40%	22.62%	+6.78%

HMSFX vs. HFCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMSFX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HFCSX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

HMSFX vs. HFCSX - Dividend Comparison

HMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, less than HFCSX's 42.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFCSX Hennessy Focus Fund	42.78%	48.46%	15.94%	24.51%	15.15%	17.19%	35.80%	10.78%	22.20%	0.01%	0.00%	0.20%
HMSFX Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class	7.96%	8.89%	8.12%	10.11%	11.23%	12.99%	15.54%	9.26%	4.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMSFX and HFCSX in my portfolio?

HMSFX and HFCSX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HMSFX or HFCSX?

HFCSX has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to HMSFX (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMSFX dropped -68.50% vs HFCSX's -59.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.