PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMSFX vs. MDST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMSFX vs. MDST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HMSFX having a 18.28% return and MDST slightly higher at 18.37%.


HMSFX

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.23%
6M
9.75%
YTD
18.28%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
20.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.96%

MDST

1D
0.55%
1M
2.48%
6M
12.41%
YTD
18.37%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.68M$1.58M$1.75M

HMSFX vs. MDST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HMSFX
Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class
18.28%-0.76%16.82%
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
18.37%7.09%17.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HMSFX and MDST is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024

0.83

The correlation between HMSFX and MDST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMSFX vs. MDST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HMSFX
HMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MDST
MDST Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MDST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDST Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MDST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDST Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HMSFX vs. MDST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HMSFXMDSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.95

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

8.30

-2.49

HMSFX vs. MDST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMSFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the MDST Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMSFX and MDST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HMSFX vs. MDST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMSFX drawdown since its inception was -68.50%, which is greater than MDST's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMSFX and MDST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMSFXMDSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.50%

-14.19%

-54.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-5.98%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-1.87%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-2.17%

-10.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.53%

+0.66%

Volatility

HMSFX vs. MDST - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST) at 4.47%. This indicates that HMSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMSFXMDSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

4.47%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

9.18%

+3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

12.69%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

16.04%

+3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.19%

16.04%

+13.15%

HMSFX vs. MDST - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMSFX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MDST's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMSFX vs. MDST - Dividend Comparison

HMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, less than MDST's 9.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HMSFX
Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class
7.83%8.89%8.12%10.11%11.23%12.99%15.54%9.26%4.74%
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
9.20%10.22%6.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMSFX and MDST have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HMSFX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to MDST (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMSFX dropped -68.50% vs MDST's -14.19%.

MDST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMSFX and MDST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer