HMOP vs. HQGO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HMOP (Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF) and HQGO (Hartford US Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMOP is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Hartford, while HQGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. HMOP is actively managed, while HQGO is passively managed. Over the past year, HMOP returned 6.92% vs 25.94% for HQGO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMOP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for HQGO.

Performance

HMOP vs. HQGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMOP achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than HQGO's 10.17% return.

HMOP

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: 6.92%
• 3Y*: 4.61%
• 5Y*: 1.40%
• 10Y*: —

HQGO

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 9.44%
• 1Y: 25.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMOP vs. HQGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF	1.60%	4.70%	2.52%	1.82%
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	10.17%	15.15%	25.09%	6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HMOP and HQGO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023	0.18

The correlation between HMOP and HQGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HMOP vs. HQGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMOP

HMOP Risk / Return Rank: 70
HMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
HMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
HMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
HMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
HMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 50

HQGO

HQGO Risk / Return Rank: 56
HQGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
HQGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
HQGO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HQGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
HQGO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMOP vs. HQGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMOP	HQGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	1.95	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	2.69	+1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.34	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	2.51	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.36	10.34	-1.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMOP vs. HQGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the HQGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMOP and HQGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMOP	HQGO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	1.95	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.38	-0.74

Drawdowns

HMOP vs. HQGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMOP drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum HQGO drawdown of -20.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMOP and HQGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMOP	HQGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.12%	-20.85%	+7.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-10.40%	+7.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-0.85%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-2.52%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	2.51%	-1.68%

Volatility

HMOP vs. HQGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) is 0.77%, while Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that HMOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HQGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMOP	HQGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	2.66%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.78%	9.95%	-8.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71%	13.37%	-10.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.86%	16.99%	-13.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.26%	16.99%	-12.73%

HMOP vs. HQGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMOP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HQGO's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

HMOP vs. HQGO - Dividend Comparison

HMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than HQGO's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF	3.45%	3.40%	3.22%	2.92%	2.12%	1.67%	5.26%	2.87%	2.27%
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMOP and HQGO in my portfolio?

HMOP and HQGO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HMOP or HQGO?

HQGO has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to HMOP (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMOP dropped -13.12% vs HQGO's -20.85%.

Which ETF is better, HMOP or HQGO?

On 1-year performance, HQGO leads with 25.94% vs 6.92% for HMOP. On fees, HMOP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HMOP has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HMOP or HQGO?

Over the 1-year period, HQGO has performed better with a 25.94% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMOP or HQGO?

HMOP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for HQGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HMOP or HQGO?

HMOP has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.46% for HQGO.

What is the main difference between HMOP and HQGO?

HMOP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HQGO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HMOP and 0.34% for HQGO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.