HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L
HMCD.L (HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF) and ASIL.L (Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds tracking the MSCI China NR USD, from HSBC and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMCD.L returned 5.01%/yr vs -0.15%/yr for ASIL.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMCD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASIL.L.
Performance
HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMCD.L is traded in USD, while ASIL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ASIL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMCD.L achieves a -7.16% return, which is significantly lower than ASIL.L's -6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HMCD.L has outperformed ASIL.L with an annualized return of 5.01%, while ASIL.L has yielded a comparatively lower -0.15% annualized return.
HMCD.L
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- -7.16%
- 6M
- -8.08%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- -5.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.01%
ASIL.L
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 6M
- -7.61%
- 1Y
- 8.21%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- -6.80%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMCD.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | -7.16% | 31.58% | 18.68% | -11.51% | -22.53% | -22.09% | 29.32% | 21.59% | -18.94% | 54.07% |
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF | -6.42% | 37.18% | 12.49% | -13.61% | -25.59% | -23.40% | -1.39% | 13.82% | -11.62% | 26.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMCD.L and ASIL.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2012 | 0.92 |
The correlation between HMCD.L and ASIL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Financial Services
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Communication Services
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Technology
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Basic Materials
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Healthcare
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Industrials
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Energy
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
-
Consumer Defensive
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Utilities
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Real Estate
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMCD.L
ASIL.L
HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCD.L) and Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMCD.L | ASIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.08 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 0.90 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMCD.L | ASIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.39 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | -0.22 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | -0.01 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.05 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMCD.L drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, roughly equal to the maximum ASIL.L drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCD.L and ASIL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMCD.L | ASIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -65.43% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.07% | -18.58% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.60% | -27.40% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.17% | -59.09% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.46% | -64.85% | +2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.97% | -41.02% | +6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -30.01% | +5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.24% | 9.09% | -0.85% |
Volatility
HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCD.L) is 8.20%, while Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that HMCD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMCD.L | ASIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.20% | 8.67% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.70% | 15.36% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.13% | 20.90% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.19% | 30.54% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.18% | 26.25% | -0.07% |
HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMCD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ASIL.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMCD.L vs. ASIL.L - Dividend Comparison
HMCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while ASIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMCD.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | 2.15% | 2.25% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.95% | 1.31% | 0.86% | 1.59% | 1.46% | 0.75% | 2.07% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMCD.L and ASIL.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMCD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMCD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASIL.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMCD.L and 0.65% for ASIL.L.
Find the right allocation for HMCD.L and ASIL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer