HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L
HMCA.L (HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF) and ASIL.L (Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - HMCA.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while ASIL.L tracks the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMCA.L returned 0.16%/yr vs -5.81%/yr for ASIL.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMCA.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASIL.L.
Performance
HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMCA.L is traded in GBP, while ASIL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ASIL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMCA.L achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than ASIL.L's -6.20% return.
HMCA.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 38.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
ASIL.L
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 6M
- -8.10%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.75%
- 5Y*
- -5.81%
- 10Y*
- 0.63%
HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMCA.L HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF | 9.35% | 17.38% | 13.48% | -18.58% | -17.12% | 4.17% | 39.06% | 30.18% | -12.02% |
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF | -6.20% | 27.56% | 14.40% | -17.94% | -16.69% | -22.70% | -4.32% | 9.43% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMCA.L and ASIL.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between HMCA.L and ASIL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Financial Services
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Industrials
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Basic Materials
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Consumer Defensive
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Healthcare
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Utilities
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Energy
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
-
Communication Services
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Real Estate
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMCA.L
ASIL.L
HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L) and Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMCA.L | ASIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.09 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.50 | 0.50 | +5.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.66 | 0.99 | +14.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMCA.L | ASIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 0.45 | +2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | -0.20 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.00 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMCA.L drawdown since its inception was -44.23%, smaller than the maximum ASIL.L drawdown of -59.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCA.L and ASIL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMCA.L | ASIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.23% | -59.17% | +14.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | -17.73% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.19% | -26.68% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -53.45% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.73% | -36.74% | +27.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -24.72% | +6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 9.01% | -6.55% |
Volatility
HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L) is 5.42%, while Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that HMCA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMCA.L | ASIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 8.03% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 14.30% | -3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 19.71% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 28.76% | -7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 25.11% | -2.23% |
HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMCA.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ASIL.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMCA.L vs. ASIL.L - Dividend Comparison
HMCA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while ASIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMCA.L HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF | 1.67% | 1.76% | 1.97% | 2.20% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 0.88% | 1.78% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMCA.L and ASIL.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMCA.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMCA.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASIL.L.
HMCA.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while ASIL.L tracks MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMCA.L and 0.65% for ASIL.L.
Find the right allocation for HMCA.L and ASIL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer