HMC vs. CLSE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HMC (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.) is a stock, while CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) is Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. Over the past 3 years, HMC returned 0.76%/yr vs 32.39%/yr for CLSE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HMC vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMC achieves a -6.00% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 25.76% return.

HMC

• 1D: 4.65%
• 1M: 16.14%
• YTD: -6.00%
• 6M: -5.62%
• 1Y: -5.94%
• 3Y*: 0.76%
• 5Y*: -0.47%
• 10Y*: 3.29%

CLSE

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 25.76%
• 6M: 28.57%
• 1Y: 50.91%
• 3Y*: 32.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMC vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd.	-6.00%	8.04%	-5.14%	39.86%	-23.98%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	25.76%	20.44%	35.54%	17.54%	-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between HMC and CLSE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2022	0.37

Return for Risk

HMC vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMC

HMC Risk / Return Rank: 31
HMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
HMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
HMC Omega Ratio Rank: 28
HMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
HMC Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 95
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMC vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMC	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	3.84	-4.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	5.20	-5.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.67	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	10.55	-10.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.39	39.58	-39.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMC vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMC and CLSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMC	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20	3.84	-4.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	1.59	-1.42

Drawdowns

HMC vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMC drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMC and CLSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMC	CLSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.46%	-16.45%	-74.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.18%	-4.85%	-26.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.41%	-16.45%	-18.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.98%	0.00%	-20.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.11%	-3.59%	-32.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.29%	1.29%	+14.00%

Volatility

HMC vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 4.31%. This indicates that HMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMC	CLSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.32%	4.31%	+6.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.56%	10.21%	+10.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.95%	13.32%	+16.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.81%	13.88%	+12.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.41%	13.88%	+11.53%

Dividends

HMC vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

HMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than CLSE's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.76%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd.	2.46%	4.67%	3.19%	3.29%	4.00%	3.08%	2.72%	2.90%	2.27%	2.45%	2.87%	2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMC and CLSE in my portfolio?

HMC and CLSE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HMC or CLSE?

HMC has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to CLSE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMC dropped -90.46% vs CLSE's -16.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.