HMC vs. CLSE
HMC (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.) is a stock, while CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) is Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. Over the past 3 years, HMC returned 0.50%/yr vs 30.09%/yr for CLSE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HMC vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMC achieves a -4.72% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 24.95% return.
HMC
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 6.24%
- 6M
- -8.23%
- YTD
- -4.72%
- 1Y
- -7.72%
- 3Y*
- 0.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.59%
CLSE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 22.80%
- YTD
- 24.95%
- 1Y
- 46.78%
- 3Y*
- 30.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMC vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | -4.72% | 8.04% | -5.14% | 39.86% | -25.63% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 24.95% | 20.44% | 35.54% | 17.54% | -4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMC and CLSE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMC vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank
HMC
CLSE
HMC vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMC | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.59 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 9.69 | -9.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 34.03 | -34.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMC vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMC drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMC and CLSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMC | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.46% | -16.45% | -74.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.18% | -4.85% | -26.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.41% | -16.45% | -18.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.90% | -0.87% | -19.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -3.54% | -32.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.71% | 1.38% | +15.33% |
Volatility
HMC vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 3.55%. This indicates that HMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMC | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 3.55% | +6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.88% | 10.72% | +12.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.82% | 13.73% | +17.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.23% | 13.89% | +13.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 13.89% | +11.63% |
Dividends
HMC vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison
HMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than CLSE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.76% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 1.21% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | 2.43% | 4.67% | 3.19% | 3.29% | 4.00% | 3.08% | 2.72% | 2.90% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.87% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMC and CLSE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HMC has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to CLSE (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMC dropped -90.46% vs CLSE's -16.45%.
CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HMC and CLSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer