HLT vs. BAESY
HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) and BAESY (BAE Systems PLC) are both stocks. HLT operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical), while BAESY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, HLT returned 48.67%/yr vs 18.73%/yr for BAESY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLT vs. BAESY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLT achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly higher than BAESY's 12.98% return. Over the past 10 years, HLT has outperformed BAESY with an annualized return of 48.67%, while BAESY has yielded a comparatively lower 18.73% annualized return.
HLT
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 26.36%
- 1Y
- 35.01%
- 3Y*
- 34.37%
- 5Y*
- 22.25%
- 10Y*
- 48.67%
BAESY
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 12.98%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 0.14%
- 3Y*
- 31.96%
- 5Y*
- 30.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.73%
HLT vs. BAESY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 18.69% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
BAESY BAE Systems PLC | 12.98% | 65.51% | 1.23% | 40.91% | 46.40% | 14.56% | -3.43% | 34.69% | -22.16% | 13.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLT and BAESY is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.24 |
The correlation between HLT and BAESY shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HLT:
$79.03B
BAESY:
$78.73B
HLT:
$6.50
BAESY:
$5.29
HLT:
52.41
BAESY:
19.61
HLT:
0.85
BAESY:
3.61
HLT:
6.58
BAESY:
1.44
HLT:
$12.28B
BAESY:
$54.56B
HLT:
$5.44B
BAESY:
$19.72B
HLT:
$3.00B
BAESY:
$7.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLT vs. BAESY — Risk / Return Rank
HLT
BAESY
HLT vs. BAESY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLT | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.03 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 0.01 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 0.01 | +7.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLT | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 0.00 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 1.11 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.67 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.35 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
HLT vs. BAESY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLT drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, smaller than the maximum BAESY drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLT and BAESY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLT | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.82% | -59.20% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -23.59% | +13.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -23.59% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | -23.59% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.82% | -42.13% | -8.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -15.62% | +14.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.73% | -19.33% | +9.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 9.99% | -5.56% |
Volatility
HLT vs. BAESY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) is 6.93%, while BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a volatility of 9.80%. This indicates that HLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAESY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLT | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 9.80% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 24.82% | -7.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 31.94% | -8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 28.05% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 181.03% | 27.88% | +153.15% |
Dividends
HLT vs. BAESY - Dividend Comparison
HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BAESY's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAESY BAE Systems PLC | 1.87% | 1.90% | 2.79% | 2.40% | 3.09% | 4.46% | 7.05% | 3.66% | 4.93% | 5.71% | 6.26% | 4.38% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
Financials
HLT vs. BAESY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and BAE Systems PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HLT vs. BAESY - Profitability Comparison
HLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
BAESY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
HLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
BAESY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
HLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
BAESY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HLT and BAESY have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAESY has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to HLT (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLT dropped -50.82% vs BAESY's -59.20%.
HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLT and BAESY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer