FIKLX vs. FIKMX
FIKLX (Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z) and FIKMX (Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z) are both REIT funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FIKLX returned -3.18%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for FIKMX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIKLX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FIKMX.
Performance
FIKLX vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKLX achieves a -2.76% return, which is significantly lower than FIKMX's 3.60% return.
FIKLX
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- -3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
FIKMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- —
FIKLX vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z | -2.76% | 22.93% | -9.39% | 4.32% | -26.54% | 12.03% | 5.85% | 28.22% | -2.29% |
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 3.60% | 7.29% | 8.03% | 9.51% | -14.48% | 19.04% | -0.98% | 18.04% | -1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKLX and FIKMX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FIKLX and FIKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKLX vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKLX
FIKMX
FIKLX vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIKLX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 2.05 | -1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 2.91 | -2.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.39 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 2.42 | -2.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 10.52 | -9.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIKLX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 2.05 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.58 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.55 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
FIKLX vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKLX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, which is greater than FIKMX's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKLX and FIKMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKLX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -34.49% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -3.43% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.09% | -7.16% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.93% | -18.04% | -18.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.27% | -0.48% | -18.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -5.15% | -10.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 0.79% | +4.16% |
Volatility
FIKLX vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.20%. This indicates that FIKLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKLX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 1.20% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 3.10% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 4.04% | +7.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 6.48% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 10.59% | +4.15% |
FIKLX vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKLX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKLX vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison
FIKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than FIKMX's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z | 3.18% | 3.10% | 5.24% | 2.12% | 4.60% | 5.63% | 1.94% | 5.41% | 0.00% |
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 4.67% | 4.80% | 4.81% | 5.15% | 6.24% | 1.59% | 4.90% | 5.82% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIKLX and FIKMX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIKLX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to FIKMX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKLX dropped -36.93% vs FIKMX's -34.49%.
FIKMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKLX and FIKMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer