HLIT.TO vs. CEG
HLIT.TO (Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Producers Index, while CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, HLIT.TO returned -8.89%/yr vs 47.75%/yr for CEG. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLIT.TO vs. CEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HLIT.TO is traded in CAD, while CEG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CEG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLIT.TO achieves a 25.27% return, which is significantly higher than CEG's -23.17% return.
HLIT.TO
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 25.27%
- 6M
- 34.39%
- 1Y
- 134.51%
- 3Y*
- -8.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEG
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -14.97%
- YTD
- -23.17%
- 6M
- -26.10%
- 1Y
- -13.07%
- 3Y*
- 47.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLIT.TO vs. CEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLIT.TO Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF | 25.27% | 42.90% | -43.73% | -17.02% | -2.67% |
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -23.17% | 51.51% | 109.27% | 34.22% | 75.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLIT.TO and CEG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLIT.TO vs. CEG — Risk / Return Rank
HLIT.TO
CEG
HLIT.TO vs. CEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLIT.TO | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.99 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | -0.33 | +6.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.16 | -0.68 | +20.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLIT.TO | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.55 | -0.28 | +3.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.03 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
HLIT.TO vs. CEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than CEG's maximum drawdown of -51.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIT.TO and CEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLIT.TO | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -51.09% | -26.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.73% | -40.20% | +16.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.44% | -51.09% | -23.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.85% | -34.25% | -4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.70% | -11.66% | -26.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 19.41% | -12.71% |
Volatility
HLIT.TO vs. CEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) is 8.90%, while Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) has a volatility of 15.69%. This indicates that HLIT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLIT.TO | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.90% | 15.69% | -6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 37.08% | -9.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.13% | 46.67% | -8.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.56% | 48.45% | -9.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.56% | 48.45% | -9.89% |
Dividends
HLIT.TO vs. CEG - Dividend Comparison
HLIT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than CEG's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.61% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% |
HLIT.TO Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.12% | 2.24% | 2.58% | 1.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HLIT.TO and CEG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HLIT.TO and CEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer