HLI vs. HSCZ
HLI (Houlihan Lokey, Inc.) is a stock, while HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index. Over the past 10 years, HLI returned 21.70%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for HSCZ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLI vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLI achieves a -19.84% return, which is significantly lower than HSCZ's 10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, HLI has outperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 21.70%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return.
HLI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- YTD
- -19.84%
- 6M
- -20.99%
- 1Y
- -19.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.00%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
HSCZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
HLI vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | -19.84% | 1.64% | 47.04% | 40.67% | -13.88% | 57.04% | 40.61% | 36.33% | -17.20% | 49.30% |
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 10.57% | 25.74% | 12.89% | 17.03% | -11.46% | 17.75% | 6.40% | 27.89% | -13.99% | 24.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLI and HSCZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2015 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLI vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank
HLI
HSCZ
HLI vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLI | HSCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.48 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.99 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 12.84 | -14.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLI | HSCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 2.57 | -3.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.82 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.74 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.67 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
HLI vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLI drawdown since its inception was -36.57%, roughly equal to the maximum HSCZ drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLI and HSCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLI | HSCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.57% | -34.89% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.13% | -9.61% | -23.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.13% | -12.81% | -20.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.57% | -20.11% | -16.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.57% | -34.89% | -1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.02% | -0.98% | -32.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -4.65% | -4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.21% | 2.23% | +14.98% |
Volatility
HLI vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison
Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 3.44%. This indicates that HLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLI | HSCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 3.44% | +4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.78% | 9.20% | +9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.57% | 11.21% | +14.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 13.46% | +14.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 15.66% | +11.19% |
Dividends
HLI vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison
HLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than HSCZ's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | 1.81% | 1.36% | 1.30% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 1.56% | 1.90% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 0.57% |
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 2.94% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HLI and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLI has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to HSCZ (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLI dropped -36.57% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.
HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLI and HSCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer