HLAL vs. QCLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR).
HLAL and QCLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HLAL is a passively managed fund by Wahed that tracks the performance of the FTSE Shariah USA Index. It was launched on Jul 16, 2019. QCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both HLAL and QCLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HLAL vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLAL vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | -4.25% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 10.35% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | -6.67% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 3.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a -4.25% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's -6.67% return.
HLAL
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- -4.25%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLR
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -5.64%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLAL vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLAL vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank
HLAL
QCLR
HLAL vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLAL | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.91 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 1.35 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.06 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.90 | 4.33 | +3.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLAL | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.91 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.53 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLAL and QCLR is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLAL vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison
HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than QCLR's 15.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 15.95% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HLAL vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and QCLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLAL | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -21.77% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.15% | -10.22% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | -8.78% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -6.32% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.50% | +0.36% |
Volatility
HLAL vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.86%. This indicates that HLAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLAL | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 3.86% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 8.53% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 12.06% | +7.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 12.61% | +4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 12.61% | +7.72% |