HLAL vs. IMANX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Iman Fund (IMANX).

HLAL is a passively managed fund by Wahed that tracks the performance of the FTSE Shariah USA Index. It was launched on Jul 16, 2019. IMANX is managed by Allied Asset. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000.

Performance

HLAL vs. IMANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Iman Fund (IMANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HLAL vs. IMANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	-3.31%	18.30%	16.70%	30.13%	-17.56%	28.64%	24.65%	10.96%
IMANX Iman Fund	-3.22%	17.91%	20.60%	29.36%	-29.79%	17.07%	19.88%	5.41%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HLAL having a -3.31% return and IMANX slightly higher at -3.22%.

HLAL

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: -4.62%
• YTD: -3.31%
• 6M: 0.55%
• 1Y: 22.37%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 11.90%
• 10Y*: —

IMANX

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: -8.98%
• YTD: -3.22%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: 22.57%
• 3Y*: 16.43%
• 5Y*: 7.83%
• 10Y*: 12.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLAL vs. IMANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IMANX's 1.28% expense ratio.

IMANX

Iman Fund

HLAL

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF

Return for Risk

HLAL vs. IMANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 68
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 69
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 74

IMANX

IMANX Risk / Return Rank: 70
IMANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IMANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IMANX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IMANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
IMANX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLAL vs. IMANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Iman Fund (IMANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HLAL	IMANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.14	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.73	+0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.24	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	1.61	+0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	7.25	+0.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HLAL vs. IMANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the IMANX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLAL and IMANX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLAL	IMANX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	1.14	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.38	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.28	+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between HLAL and IMANX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HLAL vs. IMANX - Dividend Comparison

HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than IMANX's 0.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.55%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMANX Iman Fund	0.13%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	1.43%	20.20%	2.72%	12.50%	12.25%	8.71%	7.93%	4.32%

Drawdowns

HLAL vs. IMANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum IMANX drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and IMANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLAL	IMANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.57%	-56.64%	+23.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.15%	-12.65%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.18%	-36.32%	+13.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.39%	-10.58%	+4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-16.82%	+11.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	2.81%	+0.08%

Volatility

HLAL vs. IMANX - Volatility Comparison

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Iman Fund (IMANX) have volatilities of 5.86% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLAL	IMANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	5.64%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	11.80%	-1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.53%	20.26%	-0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	20.55%	-3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.33%	20.65%	-0.32%