HL vs. TSEM
HL (Hecla Mining Company) and TSEM (Tower Semiconductor Ltd) are both stocks. HL operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while TSEM operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, HL returned 13.95%/yr vs 35.70%/yr for TSEM. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HL vs. TSEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -20.29% return, which is significantly lower than TSEM's 123.91% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has underperformed TSEM with an annualized return of 13.95%, while TSEM has yielded a comparatively higher 35.70% annualized return.
HL
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -27.35%
- YTD
- -20.29%
- 6M
- -18.68%
- 1Y
- 155.56%
- 3Y*
- 42.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
TSEM
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- 123.91%
- 6M
- 121.05%
- 1Y
- 553.70%
- 3Y*
- 86.93%
- 5Y*
- 56.98%
- 10Y*
- 35.70%
HL vs. TSEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -20.29% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd | 123.91% | 127.96% | 68.77% | -29.35% | 8.87% | 53.68% | 7.32% | 63.23% | -56.75% | 79.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and TSEM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 1994 | 0.13 |
The correlation between HL and TSEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HL:
$10.32B
TSEM:
$30.06B
HL:
$0.84
TSEM:
$2.15
HL:
18.18
TSEM:
122.04
HL:
0.08
TSEM:
4.30
HL:
6.47
TSEM:
18.47
HL:
4.02
TSEM:
10.11
HL:
$1.57B
TSEM:
$1.62B
HL:
$788.95M
TSEM:
$401.63M
HL:
$864.40M
TSEM:
$571.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. TSEM — Risk / Return Rank
HL
TSEM
HL vs. TSEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HL | TSEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.74 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 22.31 | -19.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 77.52 | -71.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HL vs. TSEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, roughly equal to the maximum TSEM drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and TSEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | TSEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -99.75% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.81% | -25.04% | -30.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.81% | -46.78% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.90% | -55.39% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | -62.28% | -20.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.91% | -56.05% | +4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.93% | -85.38% | +15.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.67% | 7.20% | +17.47% |
Volatility
HL vs. TSEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hecla Mining Company (HL) is 22.72%, while Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM) has a volatility of 25.08%. This indicates that HL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | TSEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.72% | 25.08% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.93% | 55.81% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.59% | 68.83% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.35% | 47.30% | +12.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.77% | 43.61% | +19.16% |
Dividends
HL vs. TSEM - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while TSEM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HL vs. TSEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and Tower Semiconductor Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HL vs. TSEM - Profitability Comparison
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
TSEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a gross profit of 110.95M and revenue of 413.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
TSEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported an operating income of 64.57M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
TSEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a net income of 65.03M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and TSEM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSEM has higher volatility (25.08%) compared to HL (22.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs TSEM's -99.75%.
TSEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.13 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and TSEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer