PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HL vs. LITE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HL vs. LITE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -22.38% return, which is significantly lower than LITE's 142.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has underperformed LITE with an annualized return of 13.21%, while LITE has yielded a comparatively higher 43.30% annualized return.


HL

1D
0.74%
1M
-19.97%
YTD
-22.38%
6M
-6.02%
1Y
137.76%
3Y*
41.41%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
13.21%

LITE

1D
3.68%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
142.93%
6M
161.38%
1Y
999.19%
3Y*
159.80%
5Y*
62.02%
10Y*
43.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HL vs. LITE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-22.38%291.70%2.82%-12.93%6.99%-18.97%91.83%44.43%-40.37%-24.08%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
142.93%339.06%60.15%0.48%-50.68%11.57%19.55%88.76%-14.09%26.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HL and LITE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2015

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HL:

$10.05B

LITE:

$86.14B

EPS

HL:

$0.84

LITE:

$5.26

PE Ratio

HL:

17.71

LITE:

170.11

PS Ratio

HL:

6.30

LITE:

30.07

PB Ratio

HL:

3.91

LITE:

28.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

HL:

$1.57B

LITE:

$2.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HL:

$788.95M

LITE:

$938.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

HL:

$864.40M

LITE:

$470.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HL vs. LITE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

LITE
LITE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HL vs. LITE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLLITEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.73

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

35.18

-32.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.82

134.51

-128.68

HL vs. LITE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HL Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the LITE Sharpe Ratio of 11.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HL and LITE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLLITEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

11.76

-9.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

1.04

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.77

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.75

-0.75

Drawdowns

HL vs. LITE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than LITE's maximum drawdown of -66.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and LITE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLLITEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.92%

-66.89%

-31.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.52%

-28.70%

-24.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.52%

-50.63%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.18%

-66.48%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.45%

-66.89%

-15.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.17%

-14.97%

-38.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.95%

-23.16%

-46.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.76%

7.49%

+16.27%

Volatility

HL vs. LITE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hecla Mining Company (HL) is 24.76%, while Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) has a volatility of 31.18%. This indicates that HL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LITE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLLITEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.76%

31.18%

-6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.25%

69.07%

-13.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.35%

86.01%

-13.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.31%

59.79%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.76%

56.55%

+6.21%

Dividends

HL vs. LITE - Dividend Comparison

HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while LITE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.10%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HL vs. LITE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and Lumentum Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
411.43M
808.40M
(HL) Total Revenue
(LITE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HL vs. LITE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hecla Mining Company and Lumentum Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
61.6%
44.2%
Portfolio components
HL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

LITE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumentum Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 357.00M and revenue of 808.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

HL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

LITE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumentum Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 174.50M and revenue of 808.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

HL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.

LITE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumentum Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 144.20M and revenue of 808.40M, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HL and LITE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LITE has higher volatility (31.18%) compared to HL (24.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs LITE's -66.89%.

LITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.76 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HL and LITE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer