HL vs. ION
HL (Hecla Mining Company) is a stock, while ION (Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net. Over the past 3 years, HL returned 44.78%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for ION. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HL vs. ION - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -19.56% return, which is significantly lower than ION's -1.19% return.
HL
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -13.17%
- YTD
- -19.56%
- 6M
- -20.80%
- 1Y
- 157.90%
- 3Y*
- 44.78%
- 5Y*
- 16.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
ION
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -15.33%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 78.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HL vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -19.56% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 2.02% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | -1.19% | 108.37% | -20.02% | -14.10% | -8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and ION is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank
HL
ION
HL vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HL | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.93 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 9.15 | -3.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HL vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than ION's maximum drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and ION.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -52.08% | -45.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.81% | -26.85% | -28.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.81% | -46.47% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.47% | -25.47% | -26.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.91% | -23.60% | -46.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.84% | 8.57% | +18.27% |
Volatility
HL vs. ION - Volatility Comparison
Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 21.36% compared to Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) at 13.79%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ION based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.36% | 13.79% | +7.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.58% | 32.01% | +22.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.45% | 39.57% | +33.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.39% | 31.57% | +27.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.83% | 31.57% | +31.26% |
Dividends
HL vs. ION - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than ION's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.50% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and ION have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (21.36%) compared to ION (13.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs ION's -52.08%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and ION
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer