PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HL vs. FIVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HL vs. FIVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Five Below, Inc. (FIVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -22.38% return, which is significantly lower than FIVE's -0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has underperformed FIVE with an annualized return of 13.21%, while FIVE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.35% annualized return.


HL

1D
0.74%
1M
-19.97%
YTD
-22.38%
6M
-6.02%
1Y
137.76%
3Y*
41.41%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
13.21%

FIVE

1D
-2.09%
1M
-16.42%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
6.80%
1Y
46.44%
3Y*
0.23%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
15.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HL vs. FIVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-22.38%291.70%2.82%-12.93%6.99%-18.97%91.83%44.43%-40.37%-24.08%
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
-0.99%79.46%-50.76%20.52%-14.51%18.24%36.85%24.96%54.28%65.97%

Correlation

The correlation between HL and FIVE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HL:

$10.05B

FIVE:

$10.37B

EPS

HL:

$0.84

FIVE:

$7.93

PE Ratio

HL:

17.71

FIVE:

23.51

PEG Ratio

HL:

0.07

FIVE:

2.61

PS Ratio

HL:

6.30

FIVE:

2.04

PB Ratio

HL:

3.91

FIVE:

4.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

HL:

$1.57B

FIVE:

$5.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HL:

$788.95M

FIVE:

$1.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

HL:

$864.40M

FIVE:

$757.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HL vs. FIVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FIVE
FIVE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HL vs. FIVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Five Below, Inc. (FIVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLFIVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.89

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.82

8.48

-2.65

HL vs. FIVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HL Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the FIVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HL and FIVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLFIVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.20

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.00

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.33

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.34

-0.34

Drawdowns

HL vs. FIVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than FIVE's maximum drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and FIVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLFIVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.92%

-76.40%

-21.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.52%

-24.71%

-28.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.52%

-74.13%

+20.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.18%

-76.40%

+13.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.45%

-76.40%

-6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.17%

-24.71%

-28.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.95%

-23.20%

-46.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.76%

5.50%

+18.26%

Volatility

HL vs. FIVE - Volatility Comparison

Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 24.76% compared to Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) at 18.13%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLFIVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.76%

18.13%

+6.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.25%

29.44%

+25.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.35%

39.05%

+33.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.31%

47.93%

+11.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.76%

46.13%

+16.63%

Dividends

HL vs. FIVE - Dividend Comparison

HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while FIVE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.10%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%

Financials

HL vs. FIVE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and Five Below, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
411.43M
1.29B
(HL) Total Revenue
(FIVE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HL vs. FIVE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hecla Mining Company and Five Below, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
61.6%
33.3%
Portfolio components
HL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

FIVE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five Below, Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.52M and revenue of 1.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

HL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

FIVE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five Below, Inc. reported an operating income of 154.24M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.

HL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.

FIVE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five Below, Inc. reported a net income of 123.06M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HL and FIVE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HL has higher volatility (24.76%) compared to FIVE (18.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs FIVE's -76.40%.

HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HL and FIVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer