PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HL vs. EWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HL vs. EWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hecla Mining Company (HL) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -17.53% return, which is significantly lower than EWZ's 14.17% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has outperformed EWZ with an annualized return of 10.98%, while EWZ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.86% annualized return.


HL

1D
0.19%
1M
5.54%
6M
-29.50%
YTD
-17.53%
1Y
150.61%
3Y*
44.14%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
10.98%

EWZ

1D
2.77%
1M
4.20%
6M
9.71%
YTD
14.17%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
6.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HL vs. EWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-17.53%291.70%2.82%-12.93%6.99%-18.97%91.83%44.43%-40.37%-24.08%
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
14.17%48.81%-30.41%32.62%12.09%-17.32%-20.35%27.67%-2.52%23.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HL and EWZ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2000

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HL vs. EWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EWZ
EWZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HL vs. EWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLEWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

1.85

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

4.94

+1.10

HL vs. EWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the EWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HL and EWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HL vs. EWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than EWZ's maximum drawdown of -77.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and EWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLEWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.92%

-77.25%

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.81%

-19.27%

-36.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.81%

-31.36%

-24.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.81%

-32.24%

-23.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.45%

-56.99%

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.25%

-20.49%

-29.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.90%

-35.90%

-34.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.11%

7.20%

+20.91%

Volatility

HL vs. EWZ - Volatility Comparison

Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 17.79% compared to iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) at 5.74%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLEWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.79%

5.74%

+12.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.33%

19.70%

+33.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.28%

24.98%

+48.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.43%

27.60%

+31.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.82%

33.90%

+28.92%

Dividends

HL vs. EWZ - Dividend Comparison

HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than EWZ's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
4.07%5.19%8.91%5.66%12.59%9.87%1.71%2.54%2.89%1.71%1.81%4.08%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.09%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


HL and EWZ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HL has higher volatility (17.79%) compared to EWZ (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs EWZ's -77.25%.

HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HL and EWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer