PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HJIGX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HJIGX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund (HJIGX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HJIGX achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 10.59% return.


HJIGX

1D
1.75%
1M
3.84%
YTD
16.15%
6M
16.58%
1Y
36.31%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*

FHLFX

1D
0.78%
1M
1.95%
YTD
10.59%
6M
11.10%
1Y
25.40%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HJIGX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HJIGX
Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund
16.15%40.61%12.28%4.95%-23.59%2.17%32.60%23.67%-16.92%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
10.59%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HJIGX and FHLFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.87

The correlation between HJIGX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HJIGX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HJIGX
HJIGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HJIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HJIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HJIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HJIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HJIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HJIGX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund (HJIGX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HJIGXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.15

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

8.04

+1.42

HJIGX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HJIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HJIGX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HJIGX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HJIGX drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HJIGX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HJIGXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.60%

-33.58%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-11.37%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-13.62%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.60%

-29.36%

-13.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-6.08%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

3.03%

+0.78%

Volatility

HJIGX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund (HJIGX) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.91%. This indicates that HJIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HJIGXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

4.91%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

12.74%

+5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.22%

15.27%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

16.06%

+4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

17.65%

+3.55%

HJIGX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJIGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

HJIGX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

HJIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than FHLFX's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.13%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%
HJIGX
Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund
2.60%3.02%0.24%0.00%0.00%1.11%0.00%5.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HJIGX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HJIGX has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to FHLFX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HJIGX dropped -42.60% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

HJIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HJIGX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer