HJIGX vs. FAOSX
HJIGX (Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, HJIGX returned 7.60%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HJIGX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
HJIGX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HJIGX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 15.91%
- 6M
- 17.35%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 22.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- —
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -2.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
HJIGX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HJIGX Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund | 15.91% | 40.61% | 12.28% | 4.95% | -23.59% | 2.17% | 32.60% | 23.67% | -14.10% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between HJIGX and FAOSX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HJIGX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HJIGX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
HJIGX
FAOSX
HJIGX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund (HJIGX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HJIGX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.95 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | -0.34 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.96 | -0.57 | +9.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HJIGX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | -0.27 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.22 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
HJIGX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HJIGX drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HJIGX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HJIGX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.60% | -36.24% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.05% | -7.26% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -13.96% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.60% | -36.24% | -6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -5.86% | +5.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.85% | -7.93% | -4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 4.00% | -0.22% |
Volatility
HJIGX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund (HJIGX) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that HJIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HJIGX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 0.00% | +7.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.52% | 3.97% | +13.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.29% | 9.12% | +11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 16.71% | +4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 16.67% | +4.45% |
HJIGX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HJIGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
HJIGX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
HJIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% |
HJIGX Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund | 2.61% | 3.02% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 5.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HJIGX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HJIGX has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HJIGX dropped -42.60% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
HJIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HJIGX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer