HJIGX vs. CIGIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HJIGX (Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund) and CIGIX (Calamos International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, HJIGX returned 7.61%/yr vs 5.46%/yr for CIGIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HJIGX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CIGIX.

Performance

HJIGX vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund (HJIGX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HJIGX achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than CIGIX's 35.71% return.

HJIGX

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 3.84%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 6M: 16.58%
• 1Y: 36.31%
• 3Y*: 20.79%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: —

CIGIX

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 35.71%
• 6M: 36.79%
• 1Y: 51.70%
• 3Y*: 24.90%
• 5Y*: 5.46%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HJIGX vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HJIGX Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund	16.15%	40.61%	12.28%	4.95%	-23.59%	2.17%	32.60%	23.67%	-14.10%
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	35.71%	23.11%	12.51%	15.33%	-30.54%	-8.98%	44.95%	29.69%	-20.35%

Correlation

The correlation between HJIGX and CIGIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2018	0.90

The correlation between HJIGX and CIGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HJIGX vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HJIGX

HJIGX Risk / Return Rank: 41
HJIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
HJIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
HJIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
HJIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
HJIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

CIGIX

CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 59
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HJIGX vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund (HJIGX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HJIGX	CIGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.03	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.72	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	3.21	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.46	11.54	-2.09

HJIGX vs. CIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HJIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the CIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HJIGX and CIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HJIGX vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HJIGX drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, smaller than the maximum CIGIX drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HJIGX and CIGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HJIGX	CIGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.60%	-64.46%	+21.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.05%	-15.88%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.30%	-19.38%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.60%	-50.15%	+7.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.79%	-15.27%	+2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	4.40%	-0.59%

Volatility

HJIGX vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund (HJIGX) is 8.05%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 12.19%. This indicates that HJIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HJIGX	CIGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.05%	12.19%	-4.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.59%	22.20%	-3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.22%	25.03%	-3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	21.58%	-0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	20.23%	+0.97%

HJIGX vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJIGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

HJIGX vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison

HJIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than CIGIX's 9.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	9.94%	13.49%	4.54%	0.28%	0.00%	0.33%	5.42%	0.00%	13.25%	3.76%	0.00%	0.13%
HJIGX Hardman Johnston International Growth Fund	2.60%	3.02%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	1.11%	0.00%	5.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HJIGX and CIGIX in my portfolio?

HJIGX and CIGIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HJIGX or CIGIX?

CIGIX has higher volatility (12.19%) compared to HJIGX (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HJIGX dropped -42.60% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.