HJEN vs. PBD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD).

HJEN and PBD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HJEN is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Indxx Hydrogen Economy Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 25, 2021. PBD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2007. Both HJEN and PBD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HJEN vs. PBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HJEN vs. PBD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HJEN Direxion Hydrogen ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-10.90%	-8.69%	-33.27%	-13.86%
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF	12.30%	43.65%	-26.39%	-10.69%	-29.70%	-10.71%

Returns By Period

HJEN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBD

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 12.30%
• 6M: 17.70%
• 1Y: 74.32%
• 3Y*: -0.55%
• 5Y*: -9.18%
• 10Y*: 7.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HJEN vs. PBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJEN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PBD's 0.75% expense ratio.

PBD

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF

HJEN

Direxion Hydrogen ETF

Return for Risk

HJEN vs. PBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBD

PBD Risk / Return Rank: 97
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HJEN vs. PBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HJEN	PBD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.01	—

Correlation

The correlation between HJEN and PBD is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HJEN vs. PBD - Dividend Comparison

HJEN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HJEN Direxion Hydrogen ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.91%	1.50%	1.24%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF	2.01%	2.71%	1.81%	2.85%	2.98%	0.67%	0.48%	1.83%	1.86%	1.76%	2.04%	1.24%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HJEN	PBD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-78.60%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-50.56%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-53.49%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HJEN	PBD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	25.35%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	28.42%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	27.11%	—