HISF vs. CTAP
HISF (First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. HISF charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.
Performance
HISF vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HISF achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 22.34% return.
HISF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HISF vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF | 0.24% | 0.65% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 22.34% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between HISF and CTAP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HISF vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank
HISF
CTAP
HISF vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HISF | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HISF | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 2.56 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
HISF vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HISF drawdown since its inception was -3.86%, smaller than the maximum CTAP drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HISF and CTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HISF | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -9.02% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -4.16% | +3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -2.16% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility
HISF vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HISF | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 24.03% | -20.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 24.03% | -20.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 24.03% | -20.08% |
HISF vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HISF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
HISF vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison
HISF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than CTAP's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF | 4.99% | 4.69% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HISF and CTAP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for HISF.
HISF has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 0.64% for CTAP.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for HISF and 0.10% for CTAP.
Find the right allocation for HISF and CTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer