PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIPAX vs. LIFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIPAX vs. LIFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Inflation Plus Fund (HIPAX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIPAX achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than LIFIX's 2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HIPAX has underperformed LIFIX with an annualized return of 2.62%, while LIFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.99% annualized return.


HIPAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.25%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.65%
10Y*
2.62%

LIFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.13%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.09%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIPAX vs. LIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIPAX
Hartford Inflation Plus Fund
1.64%6.79%1.72%4.40%-8.90%4.85%9.20%6.63%-1.34%1.83%
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
2.03%7.16%4.81%3.87%-5.34%10.43%6.05%5.17%-1.06%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HIPAX and LIFIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2011

0.40

Over the past year, HIPAX and LIFIX have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIPAX vs. LIFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIPAX
HIPAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HIPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HIPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

LIFIX
LIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
LIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIPAX vs. LIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Inflation Plus Fund (HIPAX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIPAXLIFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.55

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

4.42

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

19.68

-9.79

HIPAX vs. LIFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the LIFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIPAX and LIFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIPAXLIFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.41

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.79

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.88

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.50

+0.14

Drawdowns

HIPAX vs. LIFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIPAX drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, smaller than the maximum LIFIX drawdown of -18.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPAX and LIFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIPAXLIFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-18.02%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-1.27%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.90%

-2.11%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.61%

-8.49%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.61%

-18.02%

+6.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.08%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-3.23%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.28%

+0.26%

Volatility

HIPAX vs. LIFIX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund (HIPAX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) at 0.74%. This indicates that HIPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIPAXLIFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.74%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.02%

1.67%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77%

2.33%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.06%

4.01%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

4.53%

-0.22%

HIPAX vs. LIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIPAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than LIFIX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIPAX vs. LIFIX - Dividend Comparison

HIPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than LIFIX's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIPAX
Hartford Inflation Plus Fund
3.57%3.10%2.71%2.97%6.00%2.82%1.61%1.73%3.79%4.63%1.18%0.00%
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
4.92%4.94%4.17%3.88%2.77%2.55%3.77%4.15%4.18%3.96%4.43%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIPAX and LIFIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIPAX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to LIFIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIPAX dropped -13.92% vs LIFIX's -18.02%.

LIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIPAX and LIFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer