HIMZ vs. WTIU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU).

HIMZ and WTIU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HIMZ is an actively managed fund by Defiance. It was launched on Mar 12, 2025. WTIU is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). It was launched on Feb 16, 2023.

Performance

HIMZ vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HIMZ vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	-71.55%	-65.21%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	141.86%	-13.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -71.55% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 141.86% return.

HIMZ

• 1D: 21.95%
• 1M: 69.46%
• YTD: -71.55%
• 6M: -92.53%
• 1Y: -88.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WTIU

• 1D: -5.22%
• 1M: 43.87%
• YTD: 141.86%
• 6M: 115.33%
• 1Y: 68.67%
• 3Y*: 6.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMZ vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.

HIMZ

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF

WTIU

MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ

HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 51
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 59
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIMZ	WTIU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	0.85	-1.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	1.47	-1.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.21	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	1.42	-2.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	2.65	-3.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIMZ vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMZ and WTIU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMZ	WTIU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43	0.85	-1.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.44	0.00	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and WTIU is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HIMZ vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.59%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	8.59%	2.44%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and WTIU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMZ	WTIU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.18%	-75.73%	-22.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.18%	-53.11%	-45.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.91%	-14.27%	-82.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.39%	-39.51%	-24.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	70.45%	28.50%	+41.95%

Volatility

HIMZ vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a higher volatility of 79.45% compared to MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) at 17.75%. This indicates that HIMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIMZ	WTIU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	79.45%	17.75%	+61.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	127.80%	44.75%	+83.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.42%	80.86%	+122.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.86%	69.25%	+134.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.86%	69.25%	+134.61%