PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMZ vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMZ vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -44.56% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.


HIMZ

1D
-3.64%
1M
78.12%
YTD
-44.56%
6M
-52.24%
1Y
-79.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMZ vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HIMZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF
-44.56%-25.47%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
744.89%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and LINT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.18

HIMZ vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIMZ
LINT

Consumer Defensive

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

HIMZ
100.0%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

HIMZ

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

HIMZ

-

LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

HIMZ

-

LINT

-

Energy

HIMZ

-

LINT

-

Financial Services

HIMZ

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

HIMZ

-

LINT

-

Industrials

HIMZ

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

HIMZ

-

LINT

-

Technology

HIMZ

-

LINT
100.0%

Utilities

HIMZ

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ
HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIMZLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

HIMZ vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMZLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.18%

-49.54%

-48.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.98%

-12.86%

-81.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.79%

-20.48%

-49.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

74.50%

Volatility

HIMZ vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMZLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

136.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

195.06%

168.83%

+26.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

200.31%

168.83%

+31.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

200.31%

168.83%

+31.48%

HIMZ vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMZ vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HIMZ and LINT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.

HIMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMZ and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer