HIMY vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HIMY (Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HIMS ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIMY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIMY charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

HIMY vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HIMS ETF (HIMY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMY achieves a -13.23% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.43% return.

HIMY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -13.23%
• 6M: -31.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 6.91%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 12.92%
• 1Y: 30.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMY vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIMY Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HIMS ETF	-13.23%	-47.75%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.43%	7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMY and QQQI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

HIMY vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMY vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HIMS ETF (HIMY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMY	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	1.34	-2.04

Drawdowns

HIMY vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMY drawdown since its inception was -76.38%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMY and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMY	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.38%	-20.00%	-56.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.01%	-0.17%	-73.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.64%	-2.20%	-51.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HIMY	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.97%	12.98%	+79.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.97%	17.07%	+75.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.97%	17.07%	+75.90%

HIMY vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMY has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIMY vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

HIMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.38%, more than QQQI's 13.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HIMY Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HIMS ETF	102.38%	81.61%	0.00%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.19%	13.82%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMY and QQQI in my portfolio?

HIMY and QQQI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HIMY or QQQI?

On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIMY or QQQI?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.51% for HIMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIMY or QQQI?

HIMY has the higher dividend yield at 102.38%, compared with 13.19% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between HIMY and QQQI?

HIMY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.51% for HIMY and 0.68% for QQQI.