HIMU vs. ANGL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL).
HIMU and ANGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HIMU is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Feb 7, 2025. ANGL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2012.
Performance
HIMU vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HIMU vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF | -0.62% | 1.14% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | -1.20% | 7.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIMU achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly higher than ANGL's -1.20% return.
HIMU
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANGL
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 5.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- 6.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HIMU vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIMU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HIMU vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank
HIMU
ANGL
HIMU vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIMU | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.92 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 1.29 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.22 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 1.15 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 4.78 | -3.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIMU | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.92 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.72 | -0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMU and ANGL is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HIMU vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
HIMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than ANGL's 6.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF | 5.23% | 4.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.37% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
Drawdowns
HIMU vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMU drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, smaller than the maximum ANGL drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMU and ANGL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMU | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -29.31% | +21.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -5.28% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -3.00% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -3.33% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.27% | +0.82% |
Volatility
HIMU vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) is 2.21%, while VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a volatility of 2.59%. This indicates that HIMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HIMU | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 2.59% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 3.34% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 6.51% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.79% | 7.60% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.79% | 9.30% | -1.51% |