PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMU vs. HYMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIMU vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIMU vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMU achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 0.18% return.


HIMU

1D
0.57%
1M
-2.58%
YTD
-0.62%
6M
0.10%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYMB

1D
0.49%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
0.18%
6M
1.76%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIMU vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIMU vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMU
HIMU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HIMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMU Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMU Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMU vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIMUHYMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.25

0.50

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.38

0.62

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.12

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

0.60

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.07

1.48

-0.41

HIMU vs. HYMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the HYMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMU and HYMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIMUHYMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

0.50

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.43

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between HIMU and HYMB is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HIMU vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

HIMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than HYMB's 4.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIMU
iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
5.23%4.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.58%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%

Drawdowns

HIMU vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMU drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMU and HYMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMUHYMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-29.57%

+21.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-5.07%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-2.20%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-3.84%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.06%

+0.03%

Volatility

HIMU vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison

iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) have volatilities of 2.21% and 2.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIMUHYMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

2.15%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

2.88%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

5.91%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.79%

6.63%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.79%

11.35%

-3.56%